
Quadro M4000

Radeon 780M
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon 780M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon 780M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅42.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon 780M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679 | 6,906+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280+67% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+257% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 2900 MHz+186% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+88% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 780M carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and System on the Radeon 780M.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 15W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 460.4+589% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 780M (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Phoenix |
| Release | August 18 2015 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #392 | #359 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














