Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M4000 is positioned at rank 159 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) is on rank 105, so the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $350 for the Quadro M4000, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 143.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+143.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679 | 6,959+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1785 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.47 MB | 1 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 50% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 60W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 116.0+74% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M4000 launched at $791 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) costs 57.1% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Quadro M4000) vs 46.4 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers 142.9% better value. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $500-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $150-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | 46.4+143% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #392 | #319 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)
