Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M4000 is positioned at rank #159 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679+2% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1190 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+25% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Quadro M4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 3% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s+3% | 204.8 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8+2% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M4000 launched at $791 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Quadro M4000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #392 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
