Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon R9 285

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285

2014Core: 918 MHz
Buy on Amazon

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum

Quadro M4000
8 GB 100
6,679
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX450
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080
brand logoGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Radeon R9 285
4 GB 190
6,680
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon HD 7870 XT
brand logoRadeon R9 M295X
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
brand logoRadeon RX 7700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Quadro M4000
low105 FPS
medium88 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra48 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low81 FPS
medium69 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Quadro M4000
low161 FPS
medium137 FPS
high111 FPS
ultra78 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low129 FPS
medium98 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra52 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Quadro M4000
low301 FPS
medium240 FPS
high200 FPS
ultra150 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low301 FPS
medium240 FPS
high200 FPS
ultra150 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Quadro M4000
low211 FPS
medium182 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra125 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low140 FPS
medium113 FPS
high97 FPS
ultra81 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Quadro M4000
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Quadro M4000
low135 FPS
medium115 FPS
high93 FPS
ultra73 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low142 FPS
medium124 FPS
high100 FPS
ultra81 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Quadro M4000
low73 FPS
medium58 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra33 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low55 FPS
medium43 FPS
high31 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Quadro M4000
low94 FPS
medium76 FPS
high65 FPS
ultra51 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low56 FPS
medium40 FPS
high31 FPS
ultra24 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Quadro M4000
low84 FPS
medium67 FPS
high55 FPS
ultra45 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra40 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Quadro M4000
low94 FPS
medium73 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra50 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 285
low71 FPS
medium55 FPS
high44 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M4000

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅Draws 100W instead of 190W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    217.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $791 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $542 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 217.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • ✅Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌90% higher power demand at 190W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 285 instead at 6,680 vs 6,679, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 285 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $542 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $791, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 217.7% (26.8 vs 8.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M4000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
G3D Mark Score
6,679
6,680
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1,280
1792+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.496 TFLOPS
3.29 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
80
112+40%
L1 Cache
480 KB+7%
448 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 19.9% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
211 GB/s+20%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 62.1% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 65°C.

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
TDP
100W-47%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
241mm
221mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
82°C
65°C-21%
Perf/Watt
66.8+90%
35.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M4000 came in at $791, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 was 68.5% cheaper ($542 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Quadro M4000) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the Radeon R9 285 offers 219% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M4000 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro M4000Radeon R9 285
MSRP
$791
$249-69%
Performance per Dollar
8.4
26.8+219%
Codename
GM204
Tonga
Release
August 18 2015
September 2 2014
Ranking
#392
#365
Search Quadro M4000 on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 285 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.