
Quadro M4000

Quadro T1000
Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌97.8% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
- ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $391 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro M4000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679+3% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1455 MHz+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 65°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 130.1+95% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M4000 came in at $791, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 was 49.4% cheaper ($391 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Quadro M4000) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Quadro T1000 offers 94% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $400-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 16.3+94% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #392 | #376 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














