Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M4000

2015

Why buy it

  • 35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 97.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $791 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
  • 54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $391 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • Delivers 92.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • Quadro M4000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
  • Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (6,679 vs 6,505), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $391 cheaper on MSRP at $400 vs $791, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 92.6% (16.3 vs 8.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
G3D Mark Score
6,679+3%
6,505
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
1455 MHz+44%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC
4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 65°C.

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
156mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
82°C
65°C-21%
Perf/Watt
66.8
130.1+95%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M4000 came in at $791, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 was 49.4% cheaper ($391 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Quadro M4000) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Quadro T1000 offers 94% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M4000Quadro T1000
MSRP
$791
$400-49%
Performance per Dollar
8.4
16.3+94%
Codename
GM204
TU117
Release
August 18 2015
May 27 2019
Ranking
#392
#376

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.