Radeon 840M
VS
GeForce GTX 680MX

Radeon 840M vs GeForce GTX 680MX

AMD

Radeon 840M

2024Boost: 2900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012Core: 720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 840M is positioned at rank 24 and the GeForce GTX 680MX is on rank 79, so the Radeon 840M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M

#14
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
143%
#16
129%
#17
129%
#21
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
117%
#22
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
117%
#24
Radeon 840M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
89%
#37
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
94%
#69
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
229%
#71
207%
#72
207%
#76
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
188%
#77
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
187%
#79
GeForce GTX 680MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
99%
#87
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
96%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 840M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Radeon 840M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 840M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 840M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and GeForce GTX 680MX

AMD

Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the GeForce GTX 680MX reaches 3,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the GeForce GTX 680MX uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX).

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
G3D Mark Score
3,803
3,799
Architecture
RDNA 3+
Kepler
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
1536+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 840M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 680MX has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 680MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
160 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (Kepler). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX).

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
Encoder
VCN 4.0
NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
NVDEC (Kepler)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 680MX's 122W — a 121.1% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce GTX 680MX
TDP
30W-75%
122W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90
80-11%
Perf/Watt
126.8+308%
31.1