Radeon 840M vs FirePro S7150
Radeon 840M
Popular choices:
FirePro S7150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 840M is positioned at rank 24 and the FirePro S7150 is on rank 315, so the Radeon 840M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 840M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon 840M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S7150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 840M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 840M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and FirePro S7150
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the FirePro S7150 reaches 3,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803 | 3,770 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 840M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 (FirePro S7150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 70°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+405% | 25.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $459 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Tonga |
| Release | June 2 2024 | February 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #516 | #521 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 840M and FirePro S7150
