
Radeon 840M vs GeForce GTX 880M

Radeon 840M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 840M is positioned at rank 24 and the GeForce GTX 880M is on rank 116, so the Radeon 840M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 880M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 840M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The Radeon 840M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 880M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 840M.
| Insight | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 880M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and GeForce GTX 880M

Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the GeForce GTX 880M reaches 3,826 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the GeForce GTX 880M uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803 | 3,826 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | Kepler |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+192% | 993 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 840M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 880M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 880M's 122W — a 121.1% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-75% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+304% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | GK104 |
| Release | June 2 2024 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #516 | #514 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















