GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 880M
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce GTX 880M?
The matchup between the high-end GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and the legacy mobile flagship GeForce GTX 880M reveal over a decade of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 5000% more raw compute performance, moving from the absolute height of 2014 mobile power to a world-class monster that masters uncompromised 4K Ultra gaming with ease.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features a massive 16GB of dedicated fast memory and specialized hardware for Path Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The GeForce GTX 880M is a legacy mobile solution and lacks the core count or bandwidth to handle modern high-fidelity textures with any stability. Moving from any notebook with legacy graphics to a 40-series Ti SUPER powered tower is a transformative upgrade, providing the speed and visual depth needed for the most demanding digital environments in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and detail that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The GeForce GTX 880M is now strictly piece of hardware history on legacy notebooks. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 725.4% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 880M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+725.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-725.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 109.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 880M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+109.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the GeForce GTX 880M's 3,826 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 725.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 880M uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+725% | 3,826 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+400% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+1214% | 3.05 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+163% | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+5669% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 880M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M) — a 215% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+215% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the GeForce GTX 880M's 122W — a 80.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 880M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 122W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+253% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 880M costs 74.6% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 25.5 (GeForce GTX 880M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 109.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $150-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+110% | 25.5 |
| Codename | AD104 | GK104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #11 | #514 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce GTX 880M
