Radeon 840M
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon 840M vs GeForce RTX 2060

AMD

Radeon 840M

2024Boost: 2900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 840M is positioned at rank #24 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M

#14
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
143%
#16
129%
#17
129%
#21
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
117%
#22
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
117%
#24
Radeon 840M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
89%
#37
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 271.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 840M.

InsightRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-271.1%)
Leading raw performance (+271.1%)
Longevity
RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and GeForce RTX 2060

AMD

Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 840M scores 3,803 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 271.1%. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
3,803
14,114+271%
Architecture
RDNA 3+
Turing
Process Node
4 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
256
1920+650%
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+73%
1680 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 840M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
6 GB+200%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
336 GB/s
Bus Width
System
192-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
VCN 4.0
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 72.

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
30W-81%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
229mm
Height
113mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90
72-20%
Perf/Watt
126.8+44%
88.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon 840MGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$349
Avg Price (30d)
$120
Codename
Krackan Point
TU106
Release
June 2 2024
January 7 2019
Ranking
#516
#168