Radeon 860M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 860M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 860M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

✅42.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 860M instead at 4,838 vs 4,809, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 860M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 860M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro Vega 16 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 860M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 860M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
G3D Mark Score	4,838	4,809
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	GCN 5.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.072 TFLOPS+26%	2.437 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	3000 MHz+152%	1190 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	64 KB	256 KB+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 860M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 860M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 carries 0 MB. Radeon 860M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 860M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 16.

Feature	Radeon 860M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon 860M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	322.5+403%	64.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 860M (2025 vs 2018).

Feature	Radeon 860M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	Krackan Point	Vega 12
Release	Marchar 2025	November 14 2018
Ranking	#449	#451

Search Radeon 860M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro Vega 16 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.