Radeon 860M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 860M is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 860M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 860M.
| Insight | Radeon 860M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H reaches 4,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 860M) vs 60 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 4,852 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 3840+650% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+426% |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz+43% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 96+1100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 240+650% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 768 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 60+650% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+1562% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Navi 21 |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #449 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 860M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
