Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

AMD

Radeon 860M

2025Core: 600 MHzBoost: 3000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

2014

Why buy it

  • 74.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 74.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (5,000 vs 4,838), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 860M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 860M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score
4,838
5,000+3%
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
GCN 3.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
2048+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.072 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
64 KB
512 KB+700%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 860M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
174 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
TDP
15W-94%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Perf/Watt
322.5+1513%
20.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 860M (2025 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP
$450
Codename
Krackan Point
Amethyst
Release
Marchar 2025
November 23 2014
Ranking
#449
#436

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.