
Radeon 860M

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅74.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 860M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 5,000+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 860M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 174 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+1513% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 860M (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Amethyst |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #449 | #436 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














