Radeon 860M vs Radeon Sky 500

AMD

Radeon 860M

2025Core: 600 MHzBoost: 3000 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Sky 500

2013Core: 950 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Sky 500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

  • 44.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 860M better than Radeon Sky 500?
Yes. Radeon 860M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Sky 500 averages 44.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 4,838 vs 4,723 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon 860M is a 2025 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon Sky 500 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 860M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon 860M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon 860M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Sky 500 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon Sky 500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Sky 500 is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 4,723 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
1080p
low37 FPS80 FPS
medium23 FPS65 FPS
high17 FPS51 FPS
ultra9 FPS33 FPS
1440p
low28 FPS67 FPS
medium16 FPS55 FPS
high9 FPS39 FPS
ultra5 FPS25 FPS
4K
low11 FPS24 FPS
medium7 FPS23 FPS
high4 FPS15 FPS
ultra3 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
1080p
low95 FPS119 FPS
medium61 FPS89 FPS
high40 FPS68 FPS
ultra29 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS66 FPS
medium32 FPS45 FPS
high23 FPS33 FPS
ultra18 FPS23 FPS
4K
low25 FPS24 FPS
medium14 FPS17 FPS
high12 FPS13 FPS
ultra9 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
1080p
low218 FPS213 FPS
medium174 FPS170 FPS
high145 FPS142 FPS
ultra109 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS159 FPS
medium131 FPS128 FPS
high109 FPS106 FPS
ultra82 FPS80 FPS
4K
low109 FPS106 FPS
medium87 FPS85 FPS
high72 FPS71 FPS
ultra49 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
1080p
low149 FPS144 FPS
medium116 FPS113 FPS
high98 FPS97 FPS
ultra78 FPS80 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS105 FPS
medium82 FPS85 FPS
high69 FPS73 FPS
ultra53 FPS56 FPS
4K
low62 FPS61 FPS
medium49 FPS46 FPS
high39 FPS36 FPS
ultra27 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and Radeon Sky 500

AMD

Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

AMD

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score
4,838+2%
4,723
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
1280+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.072 TFLOPS+26%
2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L1 Cache
64 KB
320 KB+400%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
TDP
15W-90%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
322.5+924%
31.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon 860MRadeon Sky 500
MSRP
$500
Codename
Krackan Point
Pitcairn
Release
Marchar 2025
March 27 2013
Ranking
#449
#455