
RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

GeForce 6200A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank #742 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9000 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The RADEON 9000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6200A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200A.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and GeForce 6200A

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the GeForce 6200A's 4 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce 6200A uses Maxwell, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 384 (GeForce 6200A). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+722% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+208% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON 9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the GeForce 6200A's 33W — a 75% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (GeForce 6200A). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-55% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+200% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9000 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 6200A launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RADEON 9000) vs Infinity (GeForce 6200A) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Strix Point | GM108 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #312 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















