
RADEON 9000
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9000 is positioned at rank 742 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is on rank 744, so the RADEON 9000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9000 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The RADEON 9000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score and 98.4% more VRAM (128 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 7500.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+98.4%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the RADEON 9000, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 6.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9000 and MOBILITY RADEON 7500

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+28% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+430% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+220% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9000 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 has 65 MB. The RADEON 9000 offers 98.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON 9000) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB+98% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+200% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9000 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (RADEON 9000) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 0% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON 9000 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49 | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Broadway |
| Release | July 15 2024 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #312 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













