RADEON 9200 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RADEON 9200 SE
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9200 SE is positioned at rank #742 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200 SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1052500% higher G3D Mark score and 4700% more VRAM (12 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9200 SE.
| Insight | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1052500%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1052500%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 26661% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9200 SE.
| Insight | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26661%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9200 SE and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
RADEON 9200 SE
The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 SE scores 3 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 1052500%. The RADEON 9200 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 240.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 31,578+1052500% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+170% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+11% | 2610 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RADEON 9200 SE lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9200 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 4700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 12 GB+4700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 12 Ultimate+48% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6+254% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9200 SE) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9200 SE draws 55W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 135.3% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 70°C.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-81% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60-14% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 110.8+110700% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The RADEON 9200 SE costs 97.5% less ($575 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 26650% better value. The RADEON 9200 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-96% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-97% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 53.5+26650% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | AD104 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #98 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9200 SE and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
