RADEON 9200 SE
Radeon IGP 320M
RADEON 9200 SE vs Radeon IGP 320M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON 9200 SE vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON 9200 SE vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON 9200 SE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 85W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon IGP 320M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌54.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 SE vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
RADEON 9200 SE
The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Radeon IGP 320M
The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 SE scores 3 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the Radeon IGP 320M leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+364% | 3.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+132% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9200 SE has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 320M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 320M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9200 SE) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9200 SE draws 55W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 42.9% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-35% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 SE | Radeon IGP 320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #98 | #403 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9200 SE and Radeon IGP 320M
