RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
230% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

RADEON 9200 SE

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9200 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9200 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.5% (0.1 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON 9200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200 SE
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+1788%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	2900 MHz+183%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	8 MB+6054%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	8 MB+6054%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200 SE
TDP	50W-9%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	60
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9200 came in at $99, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 SE was 69.7% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 9200) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP	$99	$30-70%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.1
Codename	Polaris 24	Strix Halo
Release	May 13 2019	January 6 2025
Ranking	#898	#98

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9200 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.