RADEON 9200 SE vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9200 SE is positioned at rank 742 and the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is on rank 750, so the RADEON 9200 SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200 SE

#732

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

108570%

#734

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

98420%

#735

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

98160%

#739

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

89260%

#740

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

88650%

#742

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

100%

#743

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

100%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

80%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

60%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

60%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

50%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

40%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

40%

#750

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

30%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

30%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

30%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

30%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

20%

#755

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

10%

#756

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

10%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400

#740

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#742

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#743

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#747

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#748

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#750

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#752

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#753

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9200 SE.

Insight	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 33.3% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9200 SE.

Insight	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+33.3%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 9200 SE Benchmark Check

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9200 SE and GeForce2 MX/MX 400

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 SE scores 3 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	Turing
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	14.85 TFLOPS+360%	3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+84%	1575 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+150%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9200 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 has 512 MB. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
DirectX	8.1+16%	7.0
OpenGL	1.3+8%	1.2
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9200 SE) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	None	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 SE draws 55W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 75% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 55°C.

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
TDP	55W	25W-55%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	60	55°C-8%
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON 9200 SE) vs 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 50% better value. The RADEON 9200 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).

Feature	RADEON 9200 SE	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP	$30-77%	$129
Avg Price (30d)	$15	$15
Performance per Dollar	0.2	0.3+50%
Codename	Strix Halo	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	January 6 2025	August 1 2020
Ranking	#98	#523