
RADEON 9250 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7500

RADEON 9250
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9250 is positioned at rank 748 and the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is on rank 744, so the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9250
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON 9250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 122.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+122.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9250 and MOBILITY RADEON 7500

RADEON 9250
The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9250 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 4 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9250 is built on GCN 3.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9250) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500).
| Feature | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 4+33% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+266% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9250 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 has 65 MB. The RADEON 9250 offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON 9250) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the RADEON 9250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+297% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9250 draws 95W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7500's 50W — a 62.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9250) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 50W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9250 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 9250) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 200% better value. The RADEON 9250 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON 9250 | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $49-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Broadway |
| Release | September 29 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #420 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















