RADEON 9250 vs Radeon VE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9250 vs Radeon VE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9250 vs Radeon VE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 295W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon VE

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅RADEON 9250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon VE is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2 vs 3).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌210.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9250 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (3 vs 2), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon VE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon VE has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON 9250 vs Radeon VE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Radeon VE

The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9250 scores 3 versus the Radeon VE's 2 — the RADEON 9250 leads by 50%. The RADEON 9250 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon VE uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9250) vs 3,840 (Radeon VE). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250) vs 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1750 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9250	Radeon VE
G3D Mark Score	3+50%	2
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 5.1
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048	3840+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS	13.44 TFLOPS+228%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1750 MHz+75%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	128	240+88%
L1 Cache	512 KB	960 KB+88%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9250	Radeon VE
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9250 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon VE carries 512 MB. Radeon VE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9250 and 64-bit on the Radeon VE. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON 9250) vs 4 MB (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9250	Radeon VE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9250 draws 95W versus the Radeon VE's 295W — a 102.6% difference. The RADEON 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9250) vs 350W (Radeon VE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON 9250	Radeon VE
TDP	95W-68%	295W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	165mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9250 came in at $79, while the Radeon VE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon VE was 100+% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 9250) vs Infinity (Radeon VE) — the Radeon VE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is Radeon VE (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	RADEON 9250	Radeon VE
MSRP	$79	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	Infinity
Codename	Amethyst	Vega 20
Release	September 29 2015	February 7 2019
Ranking	#420	#125

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Search Radeon VE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.