MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs RADEON 9250

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9250

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
······

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs RADEON 9250 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs RADEON 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

2010

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • Delivers 115% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

  • 296.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 65 MB).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 61.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $79 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 115% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs RADEON 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500RADEON 9250
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
2048+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+266%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
80 KB
512 KB+540%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500RADEON 9250
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9250 gives you 296.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9250. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500RADEON 9250
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.25 GB+297%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 62.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500RADEON 9250
TDP
50W-47%
95W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 came in at $49, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 7500 was 38% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9250) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9250 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 7500RADEON 9250
MSRP
$49-38%
$79
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.0
Codename
Broadway
Amethyst
Release
January 7 2010
September 29 2015
Ranking
#846
#420

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.