
MOBILITY RADEON 7500 vs RADEON 9250

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Popular choices:

RADEON 9250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank 744 and the RADEON 9250 is on rank 748, so the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 7500
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON 9250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 122.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+122.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 7500 and RADEON 9250

MOBILITY RADEON 7500
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9250
The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2048+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+266% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB+540% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 has 256 MB. The RADEON 9250 offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.25 GB+297% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 62.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-47% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79 and now averages $25. The MOBILITY RADEON 7500 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7500) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9250) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7500 offers 200% better value. The RADEON 9250 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 7500 | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-38% | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-40% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3+200% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Broadway | Amethyst |
| Release | January 7 2010 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #846 | #420 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















