GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅RADEON 9250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce3 Ti 200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
88.6% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌126.3% higher power demand at 215W vs 95W.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 215W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 41.5% (0.0 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce3 Ti 200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON 9250
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2944+44%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+146%	4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz+71%	1000 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	184+44%	128
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+480%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON 9250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 carries 256 MB. GeForce3 Ti 200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9250. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON 9250) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON 9250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 77.4% difference. The RADEON 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON 9250
TDP	215W	95W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	183mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce3 Ti 200 came in at $149, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79. On MSRP, RADEON 9250 was 47% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 200 (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON 9250
MSRP	$149	$79-47%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	TU104	Amethyst
Release	September 20 2018	September 29 2015
Ranking	#94	#420

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.