RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅RADEON 9250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON 9200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 more expensive on MSRP at $99 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.4% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9250
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+421%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz+2%	1000 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	96 KB	512 KB+433%
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9250
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9250. L2 Cache: 128 KB (RADEON 9200) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9250
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 62.1% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9250
TDP	50W-47%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9200 came in at $99, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79. On MSRP, RADEON 9250 was 20.2% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 9200) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	RADEON 9200	RADEON 9250
MSRP	$99	$79-20%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	Polaris 24	Amethyst
Release	May 13 2019	September 29 2015
Ranking	#898	#420

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.