RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅+66.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Delivers 168.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 5).
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
61.2% HIGHER MSRP
$79 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 66.7% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 168.7% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 66.7%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON 9250
G3D Mark Score	5+67%	3
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	GCN 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.939 TFLOPS+45%	4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+190%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON 9250
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9250. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON 9000) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON 9250
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 145.5% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON 9250
TDP	15W-84%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.3	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9000 came in at $49, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 38% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (RADEON 9000) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON 9250
MSRP	$49-38%	$79
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	Strix Point	Amethyst
Release	July 15 2024	September 29 2015
Ranking	#312	#420

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.