RADEON 9250 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9250 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9250 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅RADEON 9250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 more expensive on MSRP at $100 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5.3% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 9250 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9250 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9250 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9250) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9250	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048	4608+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+395%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	2200 MHz+120%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	128	288+125%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9250	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9250 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 320 carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 320 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9250 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON 9250) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9250	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9250 draws 95W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 103.8% difference. The RADEON 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9250) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9250	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	95W-68%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9250 came in at $79, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON 9250 was 21% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 9250) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2015).

Feature	RADEON 9250	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$79-21%	$100
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	Amethyst	Navi 21
Release	September 29 2015	November 4 2021
Ranking	#420	#136

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.