
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs RADEON X300SE

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:

RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X300SE.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $60 for the RADEON X300SE, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 121.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+121.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and RADEON X300SE

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the RADEON X300SE's 38 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 10.5%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RADEON X300SE uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 1,408 (RADEON X300SE). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42+11% | 38 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+191% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+933% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+78% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+191% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the RADEON X300SE's 100W — a 100% difference. The RADEON X300SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 350W (RADEON X300SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 100W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 175mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.4+300% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the RADEON X300SE launched at $60 and now averages $60. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 133.3% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $60 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-50% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+133% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Navi 14 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #23 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















