RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs T1200 Mobile

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

T1200 Mobile

2021Core: 855 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs T1200 Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs T1200 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (42 vs 7,805).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.

T1200 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • +18483.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T1200 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 18483.3% in PassMark G3D (7,805 vs 42), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 12nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T1200 Mobile makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, T1200 Mobile is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 vs T1200 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

T1200 Mobile

The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the T1200 Mobile's 7,805 — the T1200 Mobile leads by 18483.3%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 1,024 (T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
42
7,805+18483%
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Turing
Process Node
4 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
4096+300%
1024
Boost Clock
2920 MHz+105%
1425 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the T1200 Mobile carries 4 GB. T1200 Mobile gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and 128-bit on the T1200 Mobile.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 12.1 (T1200 Mobile). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
DirectX
9.0
12.1+34%
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
2.0
4.6+130%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile). Decoder: VideoShader vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile).

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
Encoder
None
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
VideoShader
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the T1200 Mobile's 95W — a 103.8% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 350W (T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 175mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
TDP
300W
95W-68%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
175mm
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.1
82.2+82100%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2021).

FeatureRADEON 9500 PRO / 9700T1200 Mobile
MSRP
$0
Codename
Navi 48
Release
July 23 2025
April 12 2021
Ranking
#23
#325

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.