
RADEON 9600SE vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:

RADEON XPRESS 200M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9600SE is positioned at rank 723 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M is on rank 225, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9600SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON XPRESS 200M.
| Insight | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+17.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9600SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9600SE and RADEON XPRESS 200M

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9600SE scores 27 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON 9600SE leads by 17.4%. The RADEON 9600SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27+17% | 23 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+182% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+182% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9600SE) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9600SE draws 55W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9600SE) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 50W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9600SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON 9600SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 12 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #98 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















