
MOBILITY RADEON 9550

RADEON 9600SE
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs RADEON 9600SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs RADEON 9600SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs RADEON 9600SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
2010Why buy it
- ✅+11.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌53.8% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$65 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
RADEON 9600SE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($65 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($65 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (27 vs 30).
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs RADEON 9600SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leads by 11.1%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30+11% | 27 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+1226% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600SE carries 512 MB. RADEON 9600SE gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9600SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 0.5 GB+694% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+20% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 came in at $100, while the RADEON 9600SE launched at $65. On MSRP, RADEON 9600SE was 35% cheaper ($35 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 0.4 (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9600SE offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9600SE (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $65-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 0.4+33% |
| Codename | Broadway | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #846 | #98 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














