MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1270

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1270

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1270 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1270

2019

Why buy it

  • 693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
  • MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1270 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1270 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (31 vs 30), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1270 has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Radeon X1270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

AMD

Radeon X1270

The Radeon X1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31 points.

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 and the Radeon X1270 reaches 31 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 384 (Radeon X1270). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1270).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550Radeon X1270
G3D Mark Score
30
31+3%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+42%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550Radeon X1270
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1270 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1270 gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1270. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1270) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550Radeon X1270
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1270). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550Radeon X1270
DirectX
9.0
9_0b
Max Displays
0
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1270's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon X1270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 350W (Radeon X1270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550Radeon X1270
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
0.6
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 came in at $100, while the Radeon X1270 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1270 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs Infinity (Radeon X1270) — the Radeon X1270 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1270 (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550Radeon X1270
MSRP
$100
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
Infinity
Codename
Broadway
Polaris 24
Release
January 7 2010
May 13 2019
Ranking
#846
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.