
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.3% higher G3D Mark score and 296.8% more VRAM (256 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+296.8%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and MOBILITY RADEON 9550

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 30 — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra leads by 13.3%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+13% | 30 |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+322% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+2400% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+297% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+133% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100 and now averages $10. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 3.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 3.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | Broadway |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #387 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















