MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9700

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
······

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010

Why buy it

  • +11.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 104.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 83.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (27 vs 30).
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11.1% in PassMark G3D (30 vs 27), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON 9700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 83.7% (0.6 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has the stronger long-term case.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9700's 27 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leads by 11.1%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9700).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550MOBILITY RADEON 9700
G3D Mark Score
30+11%
27
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550MOBILITY RADEON 9700
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 carries 128 MB. MOBILITY RADEON 9700 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9700.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550MOBILITY RADEON 9700
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.125 GB+98%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550MOBILITY RADEON 9700
DirectX
9.0
9.0
Max Displays
0
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9700's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550MOBILITY RADEON 9700
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
0.6+20%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 came in at $100, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9700 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 0.6 (MOBILITY RADEON 9700) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9700 offers 100% better value.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9550MOBILITY RADEON 9700
MSRP
$100
$49-51%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
0.6+100%
Codename
Broadway
Broadway
Release
January 7 2010
January 7 2010
Ranking
#846
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.