MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Quadro FX 1000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Quadro FX 1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Quadro FX 1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 341.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (30 vs 34).
❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1000

2008

Why buy it

✅+13.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅98.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 65 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
400% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.3% in PassMark G3D (34 vs 30), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 341.2% (0.3 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 1000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs Quadro FX 1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

Quadro FX 1000

The Quadro FX 1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 versus the Quadro FX 1000's 34 — the Quadro FX 1000 leads by 13.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 1000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1000).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	Quadro FX 1000
G3D Mark Score	30	34+13%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+80%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	Quadro FX 1000
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1000 carries 128 MB. Quadro FX 1000 gives you 98.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1000.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	Quadro FX 1000
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.125 GB+98%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1000's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	Quadro FX 1000
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+200%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 1000 launched at $500. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 9550 was 80% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1000) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is MOBILITY RADEON 9550 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	Quadro FX 1000
MSRP	$100-80%	$500
Performance per Dollar	0.3+200%	0.1
Codename	Broadway	GT200B
Release	January 7 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#846	#815

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9550 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.