GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON 9600SE

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6400

2012Core: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9600SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON 9600SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON 9600SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON 9600SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6400

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (24 vs 27).
  • Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
  • 18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

RADEON 9600SE

2025

Why buy it

  • +12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($65 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 3025% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9600SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.5% in PassMark G3D (27 vs 24), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9600SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 16 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, and 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9600SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON 9600SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6400

The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

AMD

RADEON 9600SE

The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the RADEON 9600SE leads by 12.5%. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE).

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
G3D Mark Score
24
27+13%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+2044%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
160+400%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9600SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600SE carries 512 MB. RADEON 9600SE gives you 3025% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6400 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9600SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
VRAM Capacity
0.016 GB
0.5 GB+3025%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1+5%
2.0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6400) vs None (RADEON 9600SE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE).

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
None
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 16.7% difference. The RADEON 9600SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
TDP
65W
55W-15%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
60-20%
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.5+25%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9600SE (2025 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce Go 6400RADEON 9600SE
MSRP
$65
Codename
GK107
Strix Halo
Release
June 5 2012
January 6 2025
Ranking
#837
#98

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.