
GeForce Go 6400

Radeon X1200
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon X1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon X1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon X1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 6400
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (24 vs 33).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.
Radeon X1200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅3025% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅GeForce Go 6400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon X1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6400
The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 versus the Radeon X1200's 33 — the Radeon X1200 leads by 37.5%. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1200 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 384 (Radeon X1200). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24 | 33+38% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+14% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 6400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1200 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1200 gives you 3025% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1200) — the GeForce Go 6400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.016 GB | 0.5 GB+3025% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the Radeon X1200's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon X1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (Radeon X1200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.7+75% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon X1200 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $80 |
| Codename | GK107 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | June 5 2012 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #837 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














