GeForce Go 6400 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6400 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6400 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6400

2012

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (24 vs 30).
❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 65 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅293.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (65 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (30 vs 24), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 6400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 6400 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 6400 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6400

The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 30 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leads by 25%. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550).

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
G3D Mark Score	24	30+25%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+62%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 carries 65 MB. MOBILITY RADEON 9550 gives you 293.8% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6400 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
VRAM Capacity	0.016 GB	0.063 GB+294%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
DirectX	10.0+11%	9.0
Max Displays	1	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
TDP	65W	50W-23%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.4	0.6+50%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 6400 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GK107	Broadway
Release	June 5 2012	January 7 2010
Ranking	#837	#846

Search GeForce Go 6400 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.