
GeForce Go 6400

Radeon Xpress 1270
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon Xpress 1270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon Xpress 1270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon Xpress 1270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 6400
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (24 vs 27).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Xpress 1270
2013Why buy it
- ✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅3025% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon Xpress 1270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6400
The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon Xpress 1270
The Radeon Xpress 1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 versus the Radeon Xpress 1270's 27 — the Radeon Xpress 1270 leads by 12.5%. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Xpress 1270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1270). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1270).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24 | 27+13% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 2.368 TFLOPS+242% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 320 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 6400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Xpress 1270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1270 carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1270 gives you 3025% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6400 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1270. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 512 KB (Radeon Xpress 1270) — the Radeon Xpress 1270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.016 GB | 0.5 GB+3025% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1270). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6400) vs Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1270). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the Radeon Xpress 1270's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce Go 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1270 (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon Xpress 1270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Curacao |
| Release | June 5 2012 | November 13 2013 |
| Ranking | #837 | #476 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














