GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6400

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020

Why buy it

✅3025% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 16 MB).
✅GeForce Go 6400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON XPRESS 200M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 6400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.3% in PassMark G3D (24 vs 23), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON XPRESS 200M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 16 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce Go 6400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce Go 6400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON XPRESS 200M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6400

The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M reaches 23 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	24+4%	23
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+661%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	160+400%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON XPRESS 200M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M carries 512 MB. RADEON XPRESS 200M gives you 3025% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6400 and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	0.016 GB	0.5 GB+3025%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	RADEON XPRESS 200M
DirectX	10.0+11%	9_0
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6400) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).

Feature	GeForce Go 6400	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	MPEG-2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.