GeForce Go 6400 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M
GeForce Go 6400
Popular choices:
RADEON XPRESS 200M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6400 is positioned at rank 338 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M is on rank 225, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6400
Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+3025%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6400 and RADEON XPRESS 200M
GeForce Go 6400
The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.
RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M reaches 23 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24+4% | 23 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 5.274 TFLOPS+661% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 160+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6400 comes with 16 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M has 512 MB. The RADEON XPRESS 200M offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.016 GB | 0.5 GB+3025% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6400) vs None (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.5+25% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 6400 and RADEON XPRESS 200M
