
GeForce Go 6400

Radeon 9550 / X1050
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 6400
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (24 vs 29).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.
Radeon 9550 / X1050
2019Why buy it
- ✅+20.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅3025% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅GeForce Go 6400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 6400 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6400
The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon 9550 / X1050
The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 leads by 20.8%. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24 | 29+21% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+80% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 6400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 carries 512 MB. Radeon 9550 / X1050 gives you 3025% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6400 and 64-bit on the Radeon 9550 / X1050. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 512 KB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.016 GB | 0.5 GB+3025% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 165mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.6+50% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 9550 / X1050 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6400 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Lexa |
| Release | June 5 2012 | March 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #837 | #772 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














