
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

RADEON 9600SE
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9600SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9600SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9600SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 55W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
- ❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.
RADEON 9600SE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($65 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (27 vs 34).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 55W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9600SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra leads by 25.9%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 40 (RADEON 9600SE) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+26% | 27 |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+214% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2900 MHz+151% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9600SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600SE carries 512 MB. RADEON 9600SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 64-bit on the RADEON 9600SE. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs None (RADEON 9600SE). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | None |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 75% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-55% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+180% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the RADEON 9600SE launched at $65. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($65 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.4 (RADEON 9600SE) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9600SE (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $65 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | Strix Halo |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #387 | #98 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














