
RADEON 9800 SE vs Radeon X1270

RADEON 9800 SE
Popular choices:

Radeon X1270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RADEON 9800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon X1270 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800 SE.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-29.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+29.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9800 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1270, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 26.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 SE and Radeon X1270

RADEON 9800 SE
The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.

Radeon X1270
The Radeon X1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 SE scores 24 versus the Radeon X1270's 31 — the Radeon X1270 leads by 29.2%. The RADEON 9800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon X1270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 384 (Radeon X1270). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1270). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24 | 31+29% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+1788% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+183% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 160+567% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+6054% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9800 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1270 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1270 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon X1270) — the RADEON 9800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+6054% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9800 SE draws 55W versus the Radeon X1270's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon X1270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 50W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.6+50% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9800 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon X1270 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON 9800 SE costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1270) — the RADEON 9800 SE offers 33.3% better value. The RADEON 9800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | Radeon X1270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-39% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8+33% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #98 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















