RADEON 9800 SE
VS
Radeon X1270

RADEON 9800 SE vs Radeon X1270

AMD

RADEON 9800 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1270

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RADEON 9800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon X1270 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800 SE.

InsightRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-29.2%)
Leading raw performance (+29.2%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9800 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1270, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 26.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+26.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 SE and Radeon X1270

AMD

RADEON 9800 SE

The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.

AMD

Radeon X1270

The Radeon X1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 SE scores 24 versus the Radeon X1270's 31 — the Radeon X1270 leads by 29.2%. The RADEON 9800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon X1270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 384 (Radeon X1270). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1270). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
G3D Mark Score
24
31+29%
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
GCN 3.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+567%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
14.85 TFLOPS+1788%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+183%
1024 MHz
ROPs
64+700%
8
TMUs
160+567%
24
L2 Cache
8 MB+6054%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9800 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1270 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1270 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon X1270) — the RADEON 9800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+6054%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9800 SE draws 55W versus the Radeon X1270's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon X1270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
TDP
55W
50W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.6+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9800 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon X1270 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON 9800 SE costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1270) — the RADEON 9800 SE offers 33.3% better value. The RADEON 9800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureRADEON 9800 SERadeon X1270
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$30-39%
$49
Performance per Dollar
0.8+33%
0.6
Codename
Strix Halo
Polaris 24
Release
January 6 2025
May 13 2019
Ranking
#98
#898