RADEON 9800 SE
RADEON XPRESS 200M
RADEON 9800 SE vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON 9800 SE vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON 9800 SE vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON 9800 SE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RADEON XPRESS 200M
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9800 SE vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
RADEON 9800 SE
The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.
RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON 9800 SE scores 24 and the RADEON XPRESS 200M reaches 23 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON 9800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24+4% | 23 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+182% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+182% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9800 SE has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON XPRESS 200M carries 512 MB. RADEON XPRESS 200M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9800 SE and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON 9800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9800 SE draws 55W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 50W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON 9800 SE (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON XPRESS 200M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 12 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #98 | #283 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9800 SE and RADEON XPRESS 200M
