
Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon AI PRO R9700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Radeon AI PRO R9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 184.1% higher G3D Mark score and 433.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+184.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-184.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $1,450 for the Radeon AI PRO R9700, it costs 96% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 750.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+750.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon AI PRO R9700 and GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 184.1%. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,589+184% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+60% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+439% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+68% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+60% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+433% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 5.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | VCN 5.0 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 180W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 95.3+70% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 95.9% less ($1390 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.7 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 751.3% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1299 | $249-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450 | $60-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.7 | 167.7+751% |
| Codename | Navi 48 | GP104 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #23 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














