Radeon E8860 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon E8860 is positioned at rank 451 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is on rank 388, so the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8860

#441

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1932%

#443

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1751%

#444

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1747%

#448

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1588%

#449

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1577%

#451

Radeon E8860

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

100%

#452

Radeon HD 7650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

99%

#453

GeForce 820A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

99%

#454

Radeon R7 M380

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#455

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

99%

#456

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7730M Dual

MSRP: $160|Avg: $40

98%

#457

Radeon HD 7850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#458

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#459

Radeon HD 8450G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#460

Radeon R9 M275X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

97%

#461

GeForce 8400 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

97%

#462

Mobility Radeon HD 550v

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

97%

#463

Radeon HD 8280G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

#464

Radeon R7 M340

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

96%

#465

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

95%

#466

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

#378

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1258%

#380

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1140%

#381

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1137%

#385

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1034%

#386

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1027%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

100%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

99%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

98%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

97%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

96%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

96%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#399

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

93%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

93%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E8860.

Insight	Radeon E8860	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon E8860	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2.4%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon E8860 Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8860 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Radeon E8860

The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).

Feature	Radeon E8860	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score	1,686	1,726+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8 TFLOPS	0.8333 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	160 KB+400%	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon E8860	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon E8860	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition's 50W — a 29.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon E8860	GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
TDP	37W-26%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	45.6+32%	34.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon E8860 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.7 (Radeon E8860) vs 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) — the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition offers 2.4% better value. The Radeon E8860 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).