Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 6900M

AMD

Radeon E8860

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6900M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 6900M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 6900M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 6900M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E8860

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6900M

2011

Why buy it

  • 62.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6900M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,707 vs 1,686), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon E8860 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon E8860 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6900M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 6900M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon E8860

The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6900M

The Radeon HD 6900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,707 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the Radeon HD 6900M reaches 1,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6900M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6900M). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6900M).

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 6900M
G3D Mark Score
1,686
1,707+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
960+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+63%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
160 KB
192 KB+20%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 6900M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E8860 and System on the Radeon HD 6900M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon E8860) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6900M) — the Radeon HD 6900M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 6900M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the Radeon HD 6900M's 75W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6900M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 6900M
TDP
37W-51%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
45.6+100%
22.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon E8860 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 6900M
MSRP
$300
Codename
Venus
Blackcomb
Release
January 25 2014
January 4 2011
Ranking
#734
#654

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.