
GeForce GT 755M
Popular choices:

Radeon E8860
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GT 755M
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌35.1% higher power demand at 50W vs 37W.
Radeon E8860
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 50W, a 13W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GT 755M
2013Radeon E8860
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 50W, a 13W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌35.1% higher power demand at 50W vs 37W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GT 755M better than Radeon E8860?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon E8860 make more sense than GeForce GT 755M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and Radeon E8860

GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Radeon E8860 reaches 1,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Radeon E8860 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 640 (Radeon E8860). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726+2% | 1,686 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 0.8 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 755M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon E8860 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8860 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 755M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Radeon E8860's 37W — a 29.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 350W (Radeon E8860). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 37W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5 | 45.6+32% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E8860 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon E8860 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GK107 | Venus |
| Release | June 25 2013 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #726 | #734 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













