GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon E8860

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon E8860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon E8860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670M

2012

Why buy it

✅70.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.

Radeon E8860

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 70.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,714 vs 1,686), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 670M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon E8860 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon E8860 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 670M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon E8860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

Radeon E8860

The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670M scores 1,714 and the Radeon E8860 reaches 1,686 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon E8860 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 640 (Radeon E8860). Raw compute: 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670M	Radeon E8860
G3D Mark Score	1,714+2%	1,686
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	640+90%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8037 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	448 KB+180%	160 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E8860 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670M	Radeon E8860
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670M has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8860 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 670M gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670M and 64-bit on the Radeon E8860. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 256 KB (Radeon E8860) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670M	Radeon E8860
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670M draws 75W versus the Radeon E8860's 37W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 350W (Radeon E8860). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670M	Radeon E8860
TDP	75W	37W-51%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.9	45.6+99%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon E8860 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670M	Radeon E8860
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	GF114	Venus
Release	March 22 2012	January 25 2014
Ranking	#728	#734

Search GeForce GTX 670M on Amazon

Search Radeon E8860 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.