Radeon E8860 vs Radeon HD 5830

AMD

Radeon E8860

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5830

2010Core: 800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon E8860

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 37W instead of 175W, a 138W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 25.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$239 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5830

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $61 less on MSRP ($239 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 28.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 373% higher power demand at 175W vs 37W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 5830 better than Radeon E8860?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,686 vs 1,726 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon HD 5830 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon E8860 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010 and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 5830 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $239 MSRP. Radeon HD 5830 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon HD 5830 is about $61 cheaper on MSRP at $239 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon E8860 is the newer 2014 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (37W vs 175W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon E8860 make more sense than Radeon HD 5830?
Yes. Radeon E8860 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (37W vs 175W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 5830. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 5830 currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.5%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
1080p
low21 FPS37 FPS
medium12 FPS23 FPS
high8 FPS16 FPS
ultra4 FPS8 FPS
1440p
low10 FPS25 FPS
medium5 FPS15 FPS
high3 FPS8 FPS
ultra1 FPS4 FPS
4K
low4 FPS10 FPS
medium2 FPS6 FPS
high1 FPS4 FPS
ultra1 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
1080p
low36 FPS48 FPS
medium19 FPS27 FPS
high13 FPS19 FPS
ultra9 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low17 FPS23 FPS
medium9 FPS14 FPS
high6 FPS9 FPS
ultra5 FPS6 FPS
4K
low5 FPS6 FPS
medium3 FPS4 FPS
high2 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
1080p
low76 FPS78 FPS
medium61 FPS62 FPS
high51 FPS52 FPS
ultra38 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low57 FPS58 FPS
medium46 FPS47 FPS
high38 FPS39 FPS
ultra28 FPS29 FPS
4K
low38 FPS39 FPS
medium30 FPS31 FPS
high25 FPS26 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
1080p
low43 FPS78 FPS
medium34 FPS62 FPS
high24 FPS52 FPS
ultra19 FPS39 FPS
1440p
low6 FPS58 FPS
medium5 FPS47 FPS
high4 FPS39 FPS
ultra4 FPS29 FPS
4K
low4 FPS39 FPS
medium3 FPS31 FPS
high3 FPS26 FPS
ultra2 FPS19 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8860 and Radeon HD 5830

AMD

Radeon E8860

The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5830

The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the Radeon HD 5830 reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5830 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830).

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
G3D Mark Score
1,686
1,726+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
1120+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8 TFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS+124%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
160 KB+43%
112 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon E8860 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5830 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 5830 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon E8860) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the Radeon HD 5830's 175W — a 130.2% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5830). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
TDP
37W-79%
175W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
280mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
45.6+361%
9.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon E8860 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239. The Radeon HD 5830 costs 20.3% less ($61 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (Radeon E8860) vs 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) — the Radeon HD 5830 offers 28.6% better value. The Radeon E8860 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon E8860Radeon HD 5830
MSRP
$300
$239-20%
Performance per Dollar
5.6
7.2+29%
Codename
Venus
Cypress
Release
January 25 2014
February 25 2010
Ranking
#734
#724